Occupy the Internet
Library Authors 2666: A Novel
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
2666: A Novel
I just finished Roberto Bolano's 2666 last night and I'm bursting to talk about it!  Who has read it?  What did you think? 

Here are some possible things we could discuss (for starters):
--issues surrounding the cohesion of the five sections:  Was it right to contravene Bolano's wish that the novel be published as five separate novels?  Does that matter?  Some critics have found the five sections to be too fragmented to produce a satisfying novel.  Do you agree?  Does this novel (as the "Note to the First Edition" by Ignacio Echevarria suggests) really have an "open structure"?
--issues around the "unfinished" nature of the novel:  What are we to make of the supposed "last line" of the novel as per Bolano's notes (as quoted in the "Note to the First Edition")?  To what extent should we consider this novel to be finished?  How does that affect our reading?
--issues of temporality, especially how the five sections relate to each other in time.       

Other possible approaches to the novel:
--critique of neoliberal globalisation.
--indictment of Mexican culture:
        "The clerk shrugged and said that all of Mexico was a collage of diverse and wide-ranging homages. 
        'Every single thing in this country is an homage to everything in the world, even the things that haven't happened yet,' he said."
(339)
--meditation on exile:
        "Exile must be a terrible thing," said Norton sympathetically.
        "Actually," said Amalfitano, "now I see it as a natural movement, something that, in its own way, helps to abolish fate, or what is                 generally thought of as fate."
        "But exile," said Pelletier, "is full of inconveniences, of skips and breaks that essentially keep recurring and interfere with anything             you try to do that's important."
        "That's just what I mean by abolishing fate," said Amalfitano.
(117)
--metaphysical detective novel

Please forgive the scattered and schematic nature of these observations/questions.  I could use some help making sense of this enormous novel. 
Books Discussed
2666: A Novel
by Roberto Bolano

What a delightful idea!  I'm planning to read it over the holidays -- it's on my Christmas list, so I had better not buy it sooner.  I've read several of Bolaño's other novels and would enjoy talking about him.

In the meantime, since I gather from your other post that you didn't read the earlier books yet, here's a quotation from Amulet that might interest you.  It's also set in Mexico:

"Then we walked down the Avenida Guerrero; they weren't stepping so lightly any more, and I wasn't feeling too enthusiastic either.  Guerrero, at that time of night, is more like a cemetery than an avenue, not a cemetery in 1974 or 1968, or 1975, but a cemetery in the year 2666, a forgotten cemetery under the eyelid of a corpse or an unborn child, bathed in the dispassionate fluids of an eye that tried so hard to forget one particular thing that it ended up forgetting everything else."  (86)

I didn't have the heart to interrupt to explain that Amulet moves fluidly in time as its narrator "remembers" forward and back from the vantage point of a crucial week in 1968.  This passage also looks forward to a later one in which she, the self-announced but sometimes self-doubting mother of Mexican poetry, speaks prophecies about the future fortunes of writers (both Latin American poets and others).

Several of the approaches you suggest would be relevant to that book as well (and also, if not always so directly, to some others).  I'm especially interested in the relations he suggests among Latin American political history and memory, writing, and prophecy; but I haven't thought about this enough to start to offer anything like a coherent account yet.

I'll write again when I have any clearer ideas; in the meantime, your hints will help when I start 2666.
Books Discussed
Amulet
by Roberto Bolano

Intriguing.  Clearly I need to read his other stuff to put 2666 in context.  Okay--we each have our Christmas reading assignments... 
Just wanted to add a pointer to an interesting article about Bolano in the NYT -- he sounds like quite a character. The article is essentially about how his widow is challenging the idea that he led a wild life. Does this matter for what he describes? I obviously am in no position to comment on this.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/books/28bola.html
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Discussion info
Latest Post: February 17, 2010 at 9:31 PM
Number of posts: 7
Spans 372 days

  
Searching
No results found.