Your home for intelligent conversation on the web
The Chamber of Politics U.S. Politics A president who doesn't believe in evolution?
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
A president who doesn't believe in evolution?
Going into the upcoming US presidential election there is a definite possibility that the president will be someone who doesn't believe in the theory of evolution - most of the Republican candidates don't!

The Republican's don't support a different scientific theory. In their position they don't support science as a field of knowledge. I don't care about Evolution, but it means we may have a president who doesn't see science, and scientific thinking, as valuable.

Should we be scared? Will it change how the country is run and how it will feel to live in it?
One thing that Obama did well at first, and for which he doesn't get any credit, is giving money to higher education. Effects of better higher education are hard to quantify within any short time frame and so it's hard for him to take credit for anything tangible. I don't know if this trend continued, but I do know that almost immediately after becoming the president many higher-education funds and scientific foundations received a lot of money. It is safe to assume that under a creationist president the fate of public higher education will be the fate of the UC system once Schwarzenegger became the governator. That is, total destruction. The University of California system is currently on its way to becoming similar to a private university (tuition-wise), and public education will be reduced to far far lesser schools.

There are currently only a few top ranked universities which are public universities. These seem on their way to extinction. (Under Obama at least we may mourn the extinction of those dinosaurs, while under a creationist they never even existed.) When people think of improving education they think of 10 year olds, or high-school, but higher education is critical for the development of a country and I feel this is where a creationist may have the most impact, or should I say, create the most damage.

In response to Mike Strong
Good point Mike. University of Michigan, another of the top public universities, is also on its way to becoming a de-facto private university.

In response to Mike Strong
Do you really believe, Mike, that children educated to the age of 18 in a school system designed by creationists would be able to take advantage of higher education, public or private? And what of all the people (voters) who never get as far as college? Of course, the impact of an anti-science, anti-intellectual government goes far beyond schools or universities -- energy, medicine, conservation, agriculture, industry, whathaveyou -- the list would be endless. Back to the Stone Age?
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

  
Searching
No results found.