Occupy the Internet
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
Against the NBA
I wanted to bring up a topic which I think many people share in one version or another. An important case is one's own country and government, but I'll use a current example of NBA Basketball.

I extremely dislike the NBA administration. For one thing the games are known to be pretty much decided in advance by the league, or at least they try to. As a team you can be headstrong and withstand a strong attack by the judges who can be for the other team, and as they can't cheat so much you always have a chance no matter how much the league wants the other team to win. That rarely happens and usually the league wins, but I'm sure there are many exceptions. That is, the NBA is not so different from wrestling and the WWF, before they were known to be fake. But this is not why I'm writing this post.

The main reason I actually hate the NBA is well exemplified by an altercation yesterday, and the league's decision about it today.To describe briefly, player P gets injured and is lying on the floor and his teammate, player KG, is standing above him checking up on him. Player Q, from the opposing team, then comes and starts laughing and mocking P, so player KG tries to move Q away and give P some room, Q doesn't want to, a fight breaks out where KG is held and then throws an elbow which hits Q in the face, who retaliates etc. No one gets injured, and KG is thrown out of the game.
So far fine. 
Q's behavior I would describe as despicable, and KG did what one would expect any teammate or a friend to do in such cases where you are worried at the health of your teammate. The league's decision on the other hand, unsurprisingly, was to suspend KG from the next game of the playoff which is a hard blow to his team, and fined Q. This is not a surprising move as the NBA has very consistently ruled this way, in fact they almost always do, and these rulings with no exception are despicable and come from a single origin.

Who would you say is the better role model in this altercation? Q or KG, who would you want your friends to behave like? If anything you would assume the league would suspend Q and just fine KG. The league demands its players be role models, but it is very far from being any kind of role model.

Why does the NBA rule this way then?  Instead of me saying why I think they rule this way, I'll quote Rasheed Wallace, who in 2003 said:
"I see behind the lines. I see behind the false screens. I know what this business is all about. I know the commissioner of this league makes more than three-quarters of the players in this league. There's a whole lot of crunching numbers that, quote-unquote, me as an athlete and me as an NBA player should know. In my opinion, they just want to draft niggers who are dumb and dumber — straight out of high school. That's why they're drafting all these high school cats, because they come into the league and they don't know no better. They don't know no better, and they don't know the real business, and they don't see behind the charade. They look at black athletes like we're dumb-ass niggers. It's as if we're just going to shut up, sign for the money and do what they tell us"

I completely agree. The league's ruling and administration essentially states clearly that the n, sorry players, are there for our amusement and shouldn't rock the cage. If the league wants to stop fighting you need to be a good little player and not fight whatever the situation. They don't expect you to be a person but only a tool for the crowd's amusement.

But the problem is this, even though I know the games are fixed, even though I despise how the league is being run, I still sometimes want to watch games. I enjoy playing basketball, and I enjoy watching it. What do I do then?

Many people have this problem with regards their country. When Bush is the president, and the country does bad things, you are still an American, and how do you relate to a country whose actions you don't like. Israeli's have this problem, Iranians do, as do many people in the world.

But even more complicated is the general structure of our society that forces us constantly to live in certain ways which we have to accept even if we don't like it.  What do we do? Do we just stop watching the NBA?
For example, I would never buy anything which gives money to the NBA, but I still might buy game tickets which then gives them money. I still might watch games which even if they don't know I do, gives them money etc.
Films Discussed
Speed Racer (Widescreen Edition)

Interesting post Arthur. I will add a comparison with the discussion on pornography One of the major issues people have with porn is the industry itself, and not its consumption. On the other hand people feel they have to consume porn; even if the actors are being mistreated and it's a manipulative industry. Everyone in some way takes part in their mistreatment by some kind of consumption, even if one tries to make sure you don't personally pay them anything. (And like NBA players, some of them are earning a lot of money).
I agree with what you say about the NBA.
Thanks Arthur. I didn't get much in reply when I brought up a post on the inequality of income distribution (the top 1% of the US population owns 35% of the net worth while the lower 80% has 15%, the figures are 43 % - 7% for financial wealth). If you are not at the top, owning the corporations, you are pretty much "working for the man". Why should sports be any different. An ugly truism is the political golden rule: He who has the Gold makes the rules.

In the movies, North Dallas Fourty and Any Given Sunday, the players are pretty much meat. And as long as we live in a system that now sees Corporations as the same as individual humans in terms of free speech (read political donations) according to the Supreme Court of the United States, the system will remain corrupt.

But, one can hardly blame the athlete who sees that his (and to a much lesser degree her) skills as a pathway to some type of independence. Unfortunately, the powers that be, are in no way interested in having the games be fair or honorable. Sports is a business and the bosses only want the rules enforced and the cash to keep flowing.

If you are just an average schlub, you have even less leverage. The best you can do is develop skills that make you a valuable comodity, show up on time and keep your mouth shut.

One of the the great tragedies of the modern era has been the ability of those in power to impugn the validity of labor unions which provided the only true protection of the worker.
Arthur,

What you do in the political realm is to stop giving money to candidates and stop supporting those whose views and actions you disagree with. That is NOT to say you support the opposing candidate, although you may support the opposing view point.

I have seen it repeatedly where a well-intentioned candidate runs for office. They want to "right the wrongs", help middle class and under privileged Americans. But then something happens:  They get elected. Suddenly their stripes change color. And so all the more I become  - as I have more increasingly - the cynic.  Sadly, it occurs all too often. And I do not see how that will change. If there were any hope it might be with a third party, but  I don't know how a viable third party can be established.
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Discussion info
Latest Post: April 19, 2010 at 9:38 PM
Number of posts: 4
Spans 1 day

  
Searching
No results found.