Occupy the Internet
The Living Room Relationships Chess and relationships
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
Chess and relationships
A small thought on Chess and relationships:

I’ve lately been playing a bit of chess, speed chess against the computer, and noticed a strange comfort. After doing a wrong move – I can take it back. Using Ctrl-Z any wrong move can be corrected. Or, at least if you catch it early enough, as if you did a wrong move 7 turns before you can still go back but then it makes more sense to simply start a new game. Playing like this demands a completely different concentration than playing against a friend. I don’t like losing to my friends much, and even if some of them will obviously beat me being so much better, I will still try to win and think ahead, while against the computer who cares. You want to win but it’s so transitory. Besides, you can take it back (which unless you’re playing against someone who treats you as a kid you can’t do when playing real chess).

Returning to the other side of the metaphor – I wish I had this Ctrl-Z in relationships, or generally in life. It makes things so much easier. Instead of thinking hard what would work you can simply try it out, and if it doesn’t work out then no worries – Ctrl-Z. Sadly, it doesn’t exist in life.

It would be comfortable to have a Ctrl-Z in life, but as I mention above, it would change life completely, and not necessarily for the better.
The idea of being able to take things back only works if you are playing against a computer, because only one person at a time can have this power.  It's like the old myth of a boy who is given a secret ball of string and whenever he is bored or wants something to end already he can simply pull out a bit more of the string and the time will fly. Of course, this ends badly. I think this is fundamentally why it is almost impossible to get the same effect watching movies at home as at the cinema: the temptation to pause or to get up is just too present.

Nonetheless, the chess and dating metaphor remains pretty fertile. For one, there are really only a few standard openings. I'll skip over the mating jokes.
Read the play "Sure Thing" by David Ives.  The full script is online:

http://thunder1.cudenver.edu/cam/eport/theater/andy/script.htm#Sure

Here are the first few lines.  The same couple (Bill and Betty) is shown at three different tables.

BILL-TABLE #1: Excuse me. Is this chair taken?
BETTY-TABLE #1: Excuse me?
BILL-TABLE #1: Is this taken?
BETTY-TABLE #1: Yes it is.
BILL-TABLE #1: Oh. Sorry.
BETTY-TABLE #1: Sure thing

(A bell rings softly)


BILL-TABLE #3: Excuse me. Is this chair taken?
BETTY-TABLE #3: Excuse me?
BILL-TABLE #3: Is this taken?
BETTY-TABLE #3: No, but I’m expecting somebody in a minute.
BILL-TABLE #3: Oh. Thanks anyway.
BETTY-TABLE #3: Sure thing.

(A bell rings softly)


BILL-TABLE #2: Excuse me. Is this chair taken?
BETTY-TABLE #2: No, but I’m expecting somebody very shortly.
BILL-TABLE #2: Would you mind if I sit here till he or she or it comes?
BETTY-TABLE #2: They do seem to be pretty late…
BILL-TABLE #2: You never know who you might be turning down.
BETTY-TABLE #2: Sorry. Nice try, though.
BILL-TABLE #2: Sure thing.

(Bell)


BILL-TABLE #1: Is this seat taken?
BETTY-TABLE #1: No, it’s not.
BILL-TABLE #1: Would you mind if I sit here?
BETTY-TABLE #1: Yes I would.
BILL-TABLE #1: Oh.

(Bell)
It's funny, I was just thinking about something similar as I passed a religious group on the street waving signs: "Can mistakes be reversed?" Obviously the issue of being able to take back one's mistakes, which is so wonderfully described in the stories here, goes much deeper. Deep enough that the main idea of evangelical Christianity, at least in America, is that forgiveness is possible (whether or not one goes far enough to postulate that the slate can truly be erased). So if one is curious what comes of this kind of an idea...

"Sure thing": what a great title for a play about the uncertainty of parallel worlds. I won't quibble with your use of the word "same."
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Discussion info
Latest Post: November 25, 2009 at 9:09 PM
Number of posts: 6
Spans 245 days

  
Searching
No results found.