That title has nothing to do with this post. Other than the fact that it is a title and this is a post about titles. If I had to reckon a guess, that heading would fall under
post-modern. Which in fact is a title itself. How titles of things have gotten so ridiculous that the above one is easily imaginable as a widely popular novel is beyond me.
What is the significance of titles of things? It must have something to do with
naming, but probably not completely. Do the titles draw you to something or is it more the author's name? Personally I like a good title. I want it to be imaginative and inviting and scary and a whole number of different adjectives that keep adding up as I delve further into the pages behind the title one.
The problem, as I see it, with titles like the one that boasts this post is that they are ridiculous. Can you even imagine a corresponding story to go with that title? Titles are powerful tools when used responsibly by the author or creator of whatever medium. They add to meaning, and sometimes are even the glue that makes the entire work one single cohesive unit.
How do you feel about books with only the name of a character as a title? It certainly is one of the oldest models I know of. Beowulf, Lolita, half of Shakespeare's plays, and well, lots of others. Boring if you ask me. But still, good books.
SO then, what are some good titles?
Shaun of the Dead
Toy Story
A Tale of Two Cities
The Big Pink
A Clockwork Orange
Brave New World
This is a long drive for someone with nothing to think about
A Midsummer Night's Dream
No Country for Old Men
Subterranean Homesick Alien
Paranoid Android
MM..Food
Ulysses
A Portrait of the Artist as a young man
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas
The Odyssey
The Watchmen