Occupy the Internet
The Chamber of Politics General Is tobacco our environmental scapegoat?
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
Is tobacco our environmental scapegoat?
             

            I expect to raise a lot of hackles and then be thoroughly shot down by overwhelming statistics and heartbreaking anecdotes, but it seems absolutely clear to me that tobacco is playing the  traditional role of a scapegoat. An immensely disproportionate amount of the blame, the approbation, and the legislation which should fall on the burners of oil and coal, the plastics purveyors, the spewers of toxins into our air, rivers and streets, on all our poisoners, has been deflected to the back of one goat: tobacco.

            I know that tobacco is harmful and that it causes cancer and other health problems. But, it does enjoy two slightly mitigating qualities that most other pollutants lack: 1) Tobacco affords pleasure to many individuals. 2) One can choose whether or not one wants to partake.

            As for secondary smoke, I have it on reliable authority (namely the pulmonologist who gave me a breath test in a hospital in Poughkeepsie five years ago) that when it comes to causing lung damage, walking down one average city block is the equivalent of smoking ten cigarettes. You can’t tell me that the air quality for a bunch of people sitting in a sidewalk café on a busy city street would be appreciably improved if none of them were smoking cigarettes. Workplaces, large restaurants, trains, buses, sure – but smoking sections, not a total ban, is the reasonable solution.

            In the ancient Hebraic or Druidic scapegoatting or sin-eating rites an irrational hysteria developed around the subject, the victim. You can detect a similar irrational hysteria about tobacco.

            Our air, our water, our food are full of dangerous chemicals, overeating and anti-depressants are making us fat and dull, wherever we go, screens that talk and sing display words and images that fill our souls with anxiety, yet all the power of the government to ease the pollution that assails us is centered on. . . cigarettes!

            This screed was actually prompted by a story in today’s newspapers about tobacco water pipes being banned in cafes in Alexandria (Egypt). !

           
Hate to burst the bubble (not hookah), but as an ex-smoker (1 year today), I totally agree with you.  What annoys me the most is the sanctinonious proselatizing you are forced to listen to from smug parrots.  Bloomberg is supposedly going to ban smoking everywhere.  God help us. 
I've been a smoker since I was twelve.  I took up sucking on Marlboros because I developed an adolescent crush on the fourteen-year-old girl next door who I found irresistible in her tight sweaters puffing on her Newport 100s.  I thought smoking would change her perception of me, which was the little boy next door she enjoyed teasing and tickling the breath out of. 

I was young enough that clerks at the corner convenience store assumed I was on errand buying cigarettes for an adult family member. Thus, all I achieved with the girl next door was the privilige of running up the street for her cigarettes whenever she ran out, as she'd been forced to get her packs from a vending machine at a local restaurant.

I have to say I don't mind eating humble pie with regard to smoking, or being downgraded to second-class ciitizenship for my habit.  I consider the decades of stink and ash we smokers subjected the rest of society to in theaters and airplanes and restaurants and every other public venue I can think of.  I remember the chrome-plated flip-top ashtrays built into the arms of public seating everywhere, as if the everyone was expected to light up anywhere we planted our behinds.

That said, I couldn't agree more that a very large percentage of the high incidence of breathing-related health problems suffered by the non-smoking public is almost certainly caused by urban industrialization and our conspicuous consumption of fossil fuels perpetuated by a collective of corporate powers that have the resources and lack of integrity to conspire effectively in scapegoating the tobacco business and blow smoke up the public's asses, pun intended.   

In fact, I was astonished and in some way vindicated when I came across this post and for the first time heard someone else make the very accusation as I had years ago living in California at the time that state was legislating its ban on smoking in public establishments.   

In response to Paul Caubet
It wasn't altruism or principle that banned tobacco, but number crunching.  The public expense of medical treatment caused states to sue tobacco companies to recover the medical costs.  In that sense I can see the point that this industry found itself almost uniquely and surprisingly on the wrong side of the tracks in terms of policy, and much of the moralising that went with the ban is insufferable hypocrisy.  And yes it is misused as a distraction from some far more important campains.

Having said that, the ban on smoking in public here in Ireland has been fantastic - guys, the smoke stinks, it makes restuarants and pubs filthy, and it does affect the health of non smokers.  Small consolation that something else might kill you first.
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Discussion info
Latest Post: October 18, 2010 at 10:15 AM
Number of posts: 4
Spans 2 days

  
Searching
No results found.