Occupy the Internet
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
On imagination
Several recent discussions on works of art here describe the investigation of imagination and its connection to reality. For example, Jessica’s post on Inception and Roy’s on Etgar Keret’s new book, post.  I think this investigation comes from a strong feeling of a disappearance of imagination from our culture. The world of Twitter, of Facebook and Zynga where people live is an imaginationless world. It’s a world of raw commerce and exchange of snippets. As in the beautiful Toy Story 3, toys and the realm of imagination which accompanies them has been replaced by the cell phone. Imagination has always been more developed with children, and people stop playing with toys at a certain age, but that age seems to be getting lower and lower these days. Four year olds are starting to play Farmville (a game where you water and raise virtual crops, I kid you not) and other Zynga games and join the world of stupidity and lack of imagination.

The rise of the virtual in lieu of imagination is increasing, and while movies of the last decade were interested in the boundary of fiction and reality, there is a different sense now of a movement to a darker place of a complete lack of imagination.

As has been mentioned here by Jessica and others, imagination and fiction is our way to reality. How can we really see reality without seeing all the other options, as lack is an important factor in seeing what is there? Can we even exist as humans without imagination and understanding the alternative? Or are we moving to be robots retweetting and (Facebook) “Liking” things, without a critical eye, without thoughts of alternatives. Without reading them in the deep sense of the word.

Schumann said about Schubert that the genius in his works lay in all the roads he shows us but chose not to take; in all the undeveloped possibilities. Can we hear those anymore or are we turning deaf to them only to hear the notes actually played?

Art in general, Fiction, was considered to be the road to a truer truth that can only be seen through art. Paintings considered showing the essence more correctly than a photograph. Currently, it seems, artists are reflecting on their craft of imagination. Are we?
A couple of years ago a friend of mine asked a kindergarten teacher what change she sees through the years. The teacher answered that the only change she sees is the growing lack of imagination of her kids.

How do we guard our own imagination against a world which seems to want to discard it?
How do we convince the world that there is a point in imagination – it’s hard to explain imagination to a robot, so we can’t wait too long. How do we transfer a wanting to develop one’s own imagination?
 
Imagine a life without imagination.
Films Discussed
Inception (Two-Disc Edition) [Blu-ray]
Toy Story 3 [Blu-ray]

I'll add. Hugh. the example of Darwinism. Darwinism is currently very popular in people's arguments. The way it is banally interpreted is simply implying survival of the fittest. But like that it is a very closed minded, de-facto, reading of life and history. It does not mean that Zebra's can stretch their necks to get to the high leaves, but instead it means that either you are a giraffe and survive, or a Zebra and die. It's not about self-improvement, nor even an improvement of a species, but a kind of assumption that only the strong species survive. In many ways it operates as a replacement to imagination and even a hindrance to it.

I'm not speaking of the science, which also isn't currently accepted in its banal form from what I'm told, but about how it has become a common approach of people to life, a life which is simply de-facto.
What a fantastic question!

As I see it, part of the problem is a misdirected and short-sighted pragmatism that’s becoming increasingly pervasive in our culture: we're all about the bottom line, and we tend to see time spent imagining alternative scenarios as time simply wasted.

This is ultimately self-defeating, since—as you so rightly say, Hugh—the cultivation of imagination is not just life-enhancing but also essential to good decision-making.  A less short-sighted approach would recognize the value of a healthy, well-exercised imagination even for the practical side of life.  Maybe that’s one way to make even hardened twenty-first-century pragmatists want to develop their imaginations: tell them that they need to, in order to be any good at what they do?

One of the most depressing things I’ve read in recent years is David Shields’s Reality Hunger, which tells us that with most novels, “you have to read seven hundred pages to get the handful of insights that were the reason the book was written.”  No, novels are not written to convey insights: if they were, they would indeed be a hopelessly inefficient medium.  They are written to spur imagining.  They are there precisely to put a necessary block between us and the bottom line (in this case, of information).

Here’s something encouraging: “Lostpedia.”  Great works of fiction (and I think Lost, for all its flaws, had its moments of greatness) invite you not just to dream them but to dream around them, constructing possible developments, alternative scenarios, what-ifs.  I agree that some aspects of the internet experience encourage passivity, but phenomena like “Lostpedia” reveal truly creative minds running at high intensity.  Could they be the locus of some measure of salvation...?
Gosh Hugh, before I began Eva Brann's The World of the Imagination I would have had more to say.  She fills almost eight hundred pages and brings up so many aspects of imagination that I'm no longer left with a simple concept.  I don't know how to answer your question.  I only want to point out that in everyday life, on the street, people are certainly using their imaginations.  Conversations, for instance, certainly show no lack of imagination or wit.  Maybe it's a matter of imagination moving out of its old locations.  Maybe it's doing its magic someplace new.  People I meet seem as vital as ever, and there would be no vitality without imagination.  Even with the new media, Twitter etc, even though the content of the messages is flat, it seems that real world space has become more dynamic.  The user's creations may not be in the text, but in the interconnected routes mapping a fluid geography that exists only because it was first imagined.
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Discussion info
Latest Post: March 8, 2011 at 7:53 PM
Number of posts: 16
Spans 196 days

  
Searching
No results found.