I think there are a lot of problems with college athletics, especially in the Division I cash cows of men's football and basketball. I think that all the people in charge, and all the people who knew about what was going on and turned a blind eye, should be punished as quickly and strongly and publicly as possible.
I don't, however, think that the season should be cancelled. What does that accomplish? It's an easy out. I agree with Buzz Bissinger in one of the links you gave, Linda. He summed up pretty eloquently what my thoughts are, so I am going to be lazy and just paste in what he said:
"Some might perceive
cancellation as an act of nobility. But most would see it for what it
would be — a desperate and unfair act of damage control by the
university to show an outraged public that every step is being taken to
do the right thing no matter how draconian.
"The current Penn State football players did not create what happened; they should not be penalized."
"The board of trustees has for now taken the appropriate
measures. Paterno was fired Wednesday night. So was president Graham
Spanier. But the operative phrase here is “for now.” If the board does
not actively and relentlessly force change of the football culture at
Penn State, then nothing will be different once the frenzy has died
down. That would be the worst disgrace of all."
I hate to see the players punished for things that were out of their control. Taking their season away seems to me to reinforce the idea that football isn't there for the athletes; it's there for the coaches and backers and moneyed interests. Fine the school so it can't profit from the season in any way. Take all the games off of television. Those punishments seem to attempt to tame the monster college football has become. But don't punish the players for the sins of people who were not focusing on their best interests.