Occupy the Internet
Dressing Room General Pockets and gender
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
Pockets and gender
Yesterday I wore my father's old leather jacket.  It is made from smooth mushroom brown leather worn soft, and one of the sleeves is chewed up at the end.  Since the sleeves are too long, I roll them up a couple of folds, and it's fine.  When I found it in my father's closet, it had some dried up apples and bread pieces in its right outside pocket.  When I put it on yesterday, I put my keys and a handkerchief in that pocket, a small pad and a pen in the other.  I put my mobile phone in the smaller one of the left inside chest pockets, some papers I needed to take in the larger of the left inside chest pockets, my wallet in the larger right inside chest pocket, and I still had an inside pocket left over. That's a total of six pockets, and all of them have room enough to carry real stuff, and to retrieve it when needed without having to scrape one's knuckles in the process.
Men probably don't know this, but it is not so easy to find a woman's coat with more than two obligatory pockets barely large enough to stuff a glove into, unless one goes to a sporting goods store.  I don't ski, but I bet that even when it comes to ski parkas, men get more pockets.
So . . .
Do most women not want pockets?  Are they really more concerned that pockets will make them look bad (fat or lumpy maybe?).  Is it just a decision on the part of designers?  Is it a hold-over from when women didn't own stuff?  Is there a good reason for this convention to persist?
Rhea, this has been a question of mine for years. I've taken to wearing cargo pants so I have enough pockets--I'd wear a fishing vest but how eccentric do I want to be?
I need a pen and a pad and my wallet--I carry a man's wallet--I need my cell phone (the kids get upset if I don't answer when they call, has she fallen and can't get up), I need my keys... I want something I can stuff into a pocket.  I hate carrying a bag, they're never well-organized enough and it's something you have to remember to drag around with you.
I get a little paranoid when I'm forced to dress up and leave my pockets at home.
Ha! It's that adage: style over substance. Or style over plain old practicality. I've noticed that the best looking, most flattering coats and jackets, cheap brands and expensive alike, all lack in pockets for women (and when there are pockets, they are shallow and just superfluous). It's probably because most women carry the obligatory purse for all our extra things anyway.

I don't think there's a good reason to continue the convention... just adding all the extra pockets to actually be used isn't considered flattering on females and most designers wouldn't ever go there. It's meant to be about streamlining silhouettes. It'd be great if we had more places that gave us the option of practicality without treating it as though it has to be related to a masculine look, or what have you. Eh, I'm still searching for those places...

In response to Shweta Private
It's a particular style though. 

I can think of plenty of flattering women's styles that could accommodate pockets without problems.  Even back in the days when people dressed much more gender specific, women used to have stash room in their bustiers.  And while I am flat-chested, and all those inside chest pockets do nothing but flatter my figure, I cannot imagine they look so bad on more generously endowed ladies either.  Also it's coats we're talking about, not the cocktail dress, although . . .

I think having to carry that extra bag can really ruin the clean line of a garment.  Not to mention having to fuss with the stupid bag when one wants to focus on whatever one came for which was hopefully something more interesting than looking good and being seen.  But even if it is all about the look, I do believe that all it takes is thinking a bit outside of the box to have additional features without sacrificing a sense a style.

Many women don't seem to mind lugging bags and purses around.  It's just me - I'm too lazy.  I like my hands and arms free, and wearing a backpack has got to be more compromising to that elegant line than a few pockets would.  In the world of moneyed elegance men just simply pull their wallet out of the inside chest pocket, while women are forever fumbling with their purse clasps while the straps are sliding off their silk clad arms.  Oops I feel a rant coming.  Better cut it short and just state the fact that I am unhappy with the majority of women's clothes.  I wish I'd learned to sew before life got so busy.

Not that I spend any time in the world of moneyed elegance, but I do like my clothes to do more than protect me from the elements.  I actually have fantasies about clothes that are yummy and comfortable while looking good and being functional.  Perhaps it is irrational to believe that it is possible to create such garments (even for short people), but I am hoping for some messiah of the fashion industry that will at last make this happen - without the use of child labour.
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Discussion info
Latest Post: November 19, 2010 at 6:28 PM
Number of posts: 9
Spans 28 days

  
Searching
No results found.