Occupy the Internet
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
Recklessness
ryan dunn died. If you don't know who that is don't be alarmed. a minor character in the occult sideshow that is Jackass, he was paid to be a sadomasochist on camera. something like this was bound to happen.

Don't get me wrong please. I hold very minimal contempt for Jackass as a cultural and anti-intellectual phenomenon. I don't hold my nose above it's low-brow humor and I'm not immune to the debaucherous (and in some ways innocent) charm of some the "stars," Ryan Dunn being one of the best. Amongst the crew of juvenile and highly competitive pranksters (who can be the most juvenile!?) Dunn always seemed a little more human than the rest. He showed hesitation before skits and often indicated remorse when something went wrong (or as planned). Jackass is best read as a reality television show about a group of sadomasochists who, through some painwrenching twist of fate, all managed to find one another. And of this cyclonic team of self-destruction, Dunn was always one of the more appealing, never malignant despite the territory of subject matter. Compare him to his best friend Bam Margera who doing the same acts comes across as an inconsiderate dick. Dunn had the same sort of shine as Johnny Knoxville (the star) who somehow found sublime revelry in the most base and self-endangering.


But, not comfortable eulogizing a man I never knew, I'd like to at least employ his death (and life) in order to question mankind's allure with recklessness. The whole concept of Jackass takes recklessness to unbridled commercial heights, but impulsive and imprudent behavior is not unique to the MTV class of person, it's something we each engage with at some time or another, and some of us more than others. How many of us have that one friend who scare us infinitely? It's like because that won't do it for themselves, we have to be afraid for them. I knew this kid who would just get loaded and hit the wheel at 120 mph through winding roads. He would drink droughts of orange soda, vodka, and cold medicine and go hiking for hours with no shoes. But he wasn't limited to reckless stupidity when he was intoxicated, I've seen him cross streets 4 lane streets through 60mph traffic, it looked like a game of Frogger. Was he just bored or did he actually want to die?

There's recklessness and risk and sometimes the line is blurry but most of the times you know when someone is just being plain stupid. Risking injury to themselves for no gain. But risk doesn't have to be a bad thing, the opposite really. I read this paper once that argued risk-taking is an evolutionary advantage as it often leads to greater pay-out. But where does the stupidity come from?

Dunn reportedly died as he was driving drunk going super fast. The car exploded kind of fast. I said at the beginning it was only a matter of time before one of the jackass dudes died and the reason why is because for years their ruthlessly self-destructive tendencies have been validated financially and socially. Why wouldn't they continue leading the lives they do?

 Personally I love biking in traffic.  A lot of times I don't wear my helmet. I'm pretty sure that adds to the appeal. I go fast. And I weave. And I go through small little holes between cars that hardly seem wide enough to fit a mouse and other times I zip through oncoming traffic. And I love it. And I know I should slow down, and be safe, and stay in my lane to the side, but I just can't, it's too much a thrill. Where does that thrill come from? Is it from being close to the edge? What about sky diving ? And deep sea diving and free climbing, and all those other activities which come with the immediate risk of harm? Why do we go after them ? Do we want to die?

HI Geoff, I’ve had Massumi”s Parables for the Virtual handy for a year or so.  Chapter seven he titles, The Brightness Confound. 

Isn’t getting lost, even seeing things that aren’t there, just a momentary grounding in an impractical dimension of reality?<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

The places we plainly see as we go about our daily lives are products of a cooperation between two sense systems.  A synesthetic system of cross-referencing supplements a systemic duality, exoreferential and self-referential, positional and moving, Euclidean and self-varyingly monadic….We always find ourselves in this fold of experience.

Just for the fun of it, can we imagine that recklessness is the fold of experience where everything is happening; where we haven’t systemized or narrowed our options to the dictates of physical, cultural, or spiritual survival?

Accordingly, recklessness is an over-abundance of vitality.  One that spills over the edges of time, without the cessation that planning requires.

In real life can’t grasp moving things.  We can’t grasp life because it is always not still.  Cognition plays with dead things in the sense that cognition’s objects must first be extracted from recklessness (or what ever we call that never-stopping) before cognition is able to manipulate them.

Can we dare to “bicycle without a helmet” through the alleys and roads of aliveness?  Learning the skill requires us to be aware of the proximity of moving objects.  Like sensing without seeing or hearing that a truck is about to narrow the road from behind.  Being spiritual reckless, do you think?, allows the James Dean Archetype to feed us alive and young from the inside out?

As is always the case, eventfulness has a voice only to ask us to internalize.  To build a sublime self we build a city on a hill inside us, a replica of experience.  Does participation in reckless behavior better allow us to keep our streets vital, weaving and shifting, to import independence and responsiveness into our mental and spiritual lives?

Does the paradigm of recklessness give us a way to divide not so distinctly living and dying? Must we really have financial planning for the soul?

Hats off to recklessness!
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Discussion info
Latest Post: June 25, 2011 at 3:35 PM
Number of posts: 2
Spans 5 days
People participating

  
Searching
No results found.