Occupy the Internet
Bedroom Under the sheets (or not) Romantic Betrayal:Should the offender confess?
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
Romantic Betrayal:Should the offender confess?
Adultery always makes for good gossip and the recent transgressions of Governor Sanford and Senator Ensign have been especially tantalizing. I guess. But I'm left wondering who is served by these public confessions? Are they not, on some level, for the men themselves? Perhaps the public mea culpa is quicker and more convenient than quietly re-dedicating themselves to their wives. Embarrassment seems a small price to pay for relieving their guilt and liberating themselves to begin new lives...in one fell swoop. 

And what about the rest of us who are not public figures? If we could be absolutely sure that our loved ones would never find out, wouldn't the kinder course of action be to keep our nasty secrets to ourselves and use the guilt to inspire us to be better partners, spouses, lovers? "If" may be the operative expression here. If there's a good chance of disclosure we're probably better off confessing before our partner hears it from someone else. Material I studied for my book suggested this is the best way to maintain the relationship. Confess, express remorse, and somehow persuade your loved one that it will never, ever happen again.

Of course, some people use adultery to exit from a relationship that is long-over. I've always thought this cowardly, especially since the new love often fades as soon as the old one is over.

The discussion of monogamy (post)  raises interesting issues, including what we are promising when we say "till death do us part." Is sexual fidelity really the most important aspect of that promise? Are we promising to never even sin in our hearts (like Jimmy Carter)? What about, say, loving-kindness? or empathy? or companionship? or care?

I would be interested to know what you think.
Books Discussed
Love Stories of Later Life: A Narrative Approach to Understanding Romance
by Amanda Smith Barusch

Hi Amanda,
I think it's an excellent point you raise which highlights a particularly American kind of evangelical worldview -- the moment of crushing self-doubt and public confession leading to the sinner emerging transformed and reborn, triumphantly dripping, from the communal pool. The nineteenth-century preachers of the Great Revival knew, as indeed our brilliant succession of public officials must feel, that there is something cathartic in pageantry and in the collective shock/acceptance/blessing. Not to mention the curious move of evangelical Christianity generally, which, in emphasizing dramatic adult conversion/baptism narratives as a way of effectively overwriting a personal relationship (birth from a particular mother) with a collective one (re-birth in Spirit, as it were), votes very clearly for the relation to community and God over the relationship to any one person -- especially, I would suggest, to the various wives in the cases you quote!

It might be worth mentioning here the post on "fitful, rudderless self-doubt" which I just mentioned to Annie, which gives something of the opposite "rebirth" scenario.
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Discussion info
Latest Post: July 31, 2009 at 8:26 AM
Number of posts: 2
Spans 2 days
People participating

  
Searching
No results found.