Hi <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas:contacts" />Robert. Great question. But if we want a useful answer we may want to rephrase it. I wish I had the knowledge. Maybe another Pandemonium does. I think it has something to do with sets, categories.
Because I think a set of laws has a boundary, inherent limits. For instance, the laws of our nation apply only to those within our borders.
If we have laws, we must have something the laws within the catagory that they want to preserve. In your example, being human would require us to not only accept certain laws, but to embrace them if we want to be human. There must be certain fundamental qualities of being human that should be ground, and sought after. If the soles of my feet grew roots and my hair re-grew every spring …?
But within the category of being human, being absolutely grounded as a human, carrying water, chopping wood, as they say—no, become that.
However, I once knew a man, me, who loved breaking the rules, such as does humor, so that, despite his revolutionary imagination beginning to fade along with his nerve—still parked crooked whenever he could. But better men and women actually bring much good by breaking rules. Maybe you.