After European leaders had agreed on a fund to save Greece from faltering on its debt, Greece Prime minister, in an inexplicable move, decided to reject it, or more precisely to bring it to a public referendum. The reaction of the European leaders was to declare the referendum not only a referendum of whether to accept the rescue plan but whether Greece remains part of the eurozone, admitting for the first time, I think, that the zone could be broken up.Â
A great article which explains the inherent problem of the eurozone and possible benefits to Greece of leaving it:
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-10-09/business/ct-biz-1009-outside-opinion-eurozone-20111009_1_eurozone-members-single-currency-debt
And yet more is at stake here than the economy. The eurozone was more than an economic tie, it was a political one. Greece leaving the eurozone, more specifically in such a manner, means a breakup with the EU (even if for the moment it will be only with the eurozone). The crumbling of the EU may foretell wars within Europe. Don't forget, it wasn't long ago that Europe was plagued by wars among its members. The economy is always tied to politics.
European friends of mine, or more specifically their grandparents who lived through WWII, cared tremendously of having a unified Europe. Is this dream over?
What may be the fallouts of a crumbling of the eurozone?
I understand the EU leaders position, and even agree with it as I don't see an alternative. It changes what the referendum is about and makes it likely and even possible to pass while before its chances were negligible. Was there another way which is not as risky?
Is there a way to fix the euro such as to allow Greece the flexibility it needs to solve its economic woes (similarly Italy, Spain, Portugal, etc.) while keeping a common economy for the EU? This is important as I'm not sure that breaking the economic ties won't also break political ones. Important but perhaps impossible.