Occupy the Internet
The Living Room Philosophy Suspension in Music and Philosophy
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
Suspension in Music and Philosophy
When I’m on trips for concerts, it is quite impossible to read novels as there is a danger I’ll start thinking about the plot while playing, so I like to read philosophical essays which make me reflect on the music without distracting me.

Last week I read Saint-Augustine “Confessions,” and there was a side note where the editor explains that Augustine was interested at some point, before becoming a Christian, in the Greek philosophers. This was at the time when he belonged to the Manicheans on his arrival to Rome, and he felt that they were giving untrue affirmations. Apparently, what he liked about the Greek philosophers was the “suspension of judgment” in their search of truth, and their affirmation that they know nothing.

It reminded me of Leon Fleisher’s musical advice. One of his most important precepts was: “Support the composer, make the long notes longer.” Staying longer on the long notes results in a suspension of time, and all composers work with their interpretation of that suspension and its release. Music, like philosophy, is also a quest for truth, and maybe the musical suspension could be translated to “suspension of judgment.” Maybe. Any thoughts on that?
Is rubato then a suspension of rhythmic judgement, Edna? This fascinates because rubato has always seemed to me to be a supreme act of judgement: 'my reshaping of the architechtonics of this piece trump the written structures or improve upon them'. But I like that you point toward the agnostic ethical stance in such interpretation.

I must say that the reason I posted this last musing of mine was not to affirm anything, and I don’t know its measure of truth, or its making any sense. It was a question, a relation between words that seduced me, and I thought it could be interesting to look and reflect upon, and what a better place to throw this idea than in here, where I look forward to interesting contribution of opinions and ideas. However, what you think I said, Sam, is certainly a mistake and a misunderstanding of what I meant. I must therefore clarify. I believe, like Fleisher, that the use of the suspension, which is indeed a sort of rubato*, is not playing gods with the music, as you wrote, or rewriting what the composer wrote already before, but it is supporting what he meant deeply. Music must have a strict notation system, in order to be written simply, thus “easily” and universally understood, but the fact that notation is simplified, doesn’t mean that the interpreter must stick to a two dimensional interpretation of the “right” notes and the “precise” rhythm. I wrote my opinion in this post, on how far from “juste” music becomes looking at it from that perspective. On the contrary, I think sticking to mathematically correct interpretations makes it less moving and less beautiful. Why not let robots play then? I like to think of composers writing sublime music as being a reflection of something deeper, something that expresses universal beauty and goes beyond music’s beauty, and the role of the interpreter lies in looking for the hidden meaning, another dimension, nowhere written.

Why do I find suspensions so fascinating? First because it is something indefinable, immeasurable. It’s a magical moment, time suspended when inhaling the scent of a rose, while tasting a Madeleine. In music, suspension is a precursor of movement, and I like so much this word- movement. Playing music, moving people is what we endeavor, could it be created by movement, by suspension?

*(for the non musicians who’d like this info: rubato consists in “stealing” some time from a certain note or a passage, which can be done by slowing down, or in the case I’m describing- suspending- giving extra time, and consequently giving the time back through playing faster, in a way that you keep the rigor of the time and measure of the external structure while being still free on the details.)

In response to Edna Stern
Hello, Edna. I'm very sorry for this misunderstanding, or rather for my precipitous reply.  I should have emphasized my last sentence: "I like that you point toward the agnostic ethical stance in such interpretation." 
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Discussion info
Latest Post: February 6, 2011 at 9:35 PM
Number of posts: 14
Spans 216 days

  
Searching
No results found.