Occupy the Internet
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
The birth of legends
I find myself listening to Jimi Hendrix. What would he be like if he were alive today? It's an impossible vision. I cannot separate the man from his death. To me, he is not human. He is a divine dream. He is something supernatural; he exists somewhere outside of time in the still-reverberating strings of his ivory white guitar. That's where his real voice is, all the truth to his existence, to his humanity, can be heard in the conversation of chords.

My favorite artists are all dead. It comes back to that question about the separation of the artist from his art. Either way, when a piece of art is created it leaves the physical realities of the world, it enters an etheric realm whereby it reaches its audience in another language. I like to think that when the artist dies, he joins the ether and the two, art and artist, are eternally reconciled.

So to me, Jimi Hendrix and every song he ever made are at one with each other. My image of him is not as a man; in my mind he is an otherwordly expression, his body is not linked to mine, it is made out of billions of tiny strings of sound. Death turned him into a God and he is eternally captured at the peak of his youth, when his energy was strongest.

Death has given birth to so many legends like this, made saints out of human flesh. Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, James Dean, Kurt Cobain, Keith Moon. John Lennon will always exist on a different plane that Paul McCartney won't. Paul McCartney is tangible to me, he is human. But to future generations he won't be, by then he'll have reunited with John, George, and Ringo and the legend of the Beatles will flourish.

Death is the ultimate contextualizer.   
   
I think what you're getting at, in my eyes at least, is the distinction between art and artist. As in, Where does Jimi Hendrix the man end and Jimi Hendrix the guitar virtuoso begin?

And it's a tough question and everyone has a different opinion. For those of us who listen to Hendrix now and only know his guitar voice through recordings and youtube videos, it is hardly possible for us to consider the man at all.  And yet we try. We look for interviews and we look for videos of him without his guitar and try to see the humanity in him that birthed his art. And we begin to see where it comes from, but at that very moment the video ends and we're again left in our Purple Haze if you will.

But in the argument should we pay attention to the artist in regarding his art, should we make the distinction between artistic mediums? For Jimi Hendrix was a live performer and his actual body was so fundamentally important to his music. But an author on the other hand, is practically removed entirely from the reader. We only have his words and maybe a picture on the back-inside-flap. How important can he be when his hands never even physically touched our book? But if I say that, certainly Jimi Hendrix is just as minimally connected with the recordings that we hear today.

So maybe we should look at some examples of different mediums and compare. Might as well leave Jimi Hendrix be and chose some of his contemporaries. How about Jack Kerouac and Jackson Pollock to keep the Js going as well as the early deaths. Can we separate the biographies of these men from the art they produced? It is certainly hard as they all were heavily inspired by the lives they lived. Kerouac wrote many novels using loosely covered aliases to himself and his friends and Pollock's abstract expressionistic style is hard to separate from his explosive personality and alcoholism.

Ultimately I imagine it's up to us to take in to account as much of or as little of the artist's life as we see fit. But as you discussed the birth of legends, I imagine it is not altogether too preposterous to suggest that the legends are the ones with the most interesting biographies and most flamboyant personalities. Michael Jackson was already a legend before he passed away, now it is merely cemented. Paul McCartney is already a legend in my mind because although he is alive, the Beatles are dead. So in my mind, legend is birthed from the combination of art, biography, which death merely sets in stone.
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Discussion info
Latest Post: July 17, 2009 at 4:06 PM
Number of posts: 2
Spans 27 days
People participating

  
Searching
No results found.