Occupy the Internet
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
The iPad fiasco
Apple have introduced the iPad. Now people have been claiming for a long time that the people who buy iThings will pay whatever apple wants and will be happy with getting a rock, singing its praises, as long as its called an iRock. Here is a nice comparison done between the iPad and a Rock (I'm sorry, I don't remember the long tail of the origin of this image as it has been making the rounds and I saw it a while ago on one of those tech sites):




This pretty much sums up what the iPad has to offer.
It is not a bad machine per-say, it is simply a bigger screened iPhone, not much stronger, and it's not clear if this is at all useful. Ah, but here comes the Apple publicity machine. They obviously have an impressive machine. So now articles are coming out who is this for. A business school professor suggests it is befitting to old people whose hands can't use mice. Another that it's a casual way to surf the net and read digital books - why not a netbook which apple ridiculed as useless? And then my favorite, an article saying that women are the key. Why? Well, because clearly women are stupid. Or, the way tech people say it, women are not "tech-savvy."  Ah, and because: "She won't buy any technology unless it's from Apple." (Is the name, a Pad, supposed to make women feel they need it, or will it turn off women from buying it?)

The major claim of Apple is that it is competing with the kindle. But wait, there is only one problem. The kindle's difference from a pc is not its screen size but a new kind of technology which makes reading its screen like reading regular paper, and much easier on the eyes. It's not only long battery life, but a completely different screen technology, that sadly doesn't yet exist (commercially) in color, but will in a year or two. It's also not able to do videos. There is development on a mixed screen which will combine the two technologies, but I don't know in what state that's in.

Ah, but it doesn't end there. We are talking about Apple so obviously any book you'll buy there you will be committing yourself into their programs and won't be able to use it otherwise. This is also true for the Kindle, though not for Barnes and Nobles Nook if I'm not mistaken. This attempt at a closed format which will force you to stay with their machine for years will hopefully fail for all of these companies, though the apple crowd as we know are happy to be mistreated, and Amazon is also a very strong force.

As a sidenote, the fact that articles with claims as how the iPad is for women still get written is astonishing, post, but Apple has a strong publicity machine and fan-base which needs to explain why this is a magnificent product.
I'm saying fiasco, but it will sell. Even the Macbook air sold, so this will sell too, even if only because as people said, the mac fanboy will be happy to expensively buy a rock as long as it has an i in front of it.
The iPad is essentially a very weak netbook, with a touchscreen, and with the iPhone interface as its operating system. Google is trying a similar trick with netbooks and Android.  With google you give up any sort of privacy for the OS being free and the freedom of developers and apps. With apple you are giving up any kind of freedom or utility (no multitasking?! Camera?) for a nice interface.
 
It's funny how Steve Jobs laughed at how bad netbooks are, to the delight of the crowd, when some of them are in fact that much better than the iPad. Oh well, once a sucker always a sucker.
In a couple of years it might develop to an interesting tool, but not for now. The iPad 5Gstd might be the one to get in a couple of years.

I should add that I do see some rare uses for it where it beats the others (iPhone/netbook/laptop/kindle) but these are so rare that I can't see why anyone would buy it now for $500.
More touchscreen netbooks though should implement the way of holding the screen, which tablets have used for many years. Like Gigabyte's one:

Products Discussed
GIGABYTE TouchNote T1028 10.1" Touch Screen WXGA TFT-LCD / N280 1.66Ghz / 1366x768 / Black LED / 1G

The question of whether mac buyers would buy an expensive rock because it's sold by Apple has been going on for many years, so it's nice of Apple to suggest settling the question once and for all.
I would begin by pointing everyone to an excellent discussion of branding from Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com (the context of his discussion is Obama's branding - though I've omitted all that in the following snippet).  As a new user I apologize if a quote of this length is inappropriate.

"The essence of a good brand is establishing high expectations with the consumer and consistently meeting them. What's striking about the iPad is how much it meets -- but does not really exceed -- expectations. Wow, the iPad looks just like a giant iPod! It has one button, just like the iPod! It plays songs and videos, just like the iPod! Multi-touch recognition! A really smart web browser! An exceptionally cool mapping function! Just like the iPod! iPad! iPod! iPad! iPod! Oh, and get this: now you can download books for your iPad too!

Who could possibly have seen this coming?
OK, well just about everyone. I'm not an Apple basher, by the way. Although I think their computers are about 40 percent overpriced, I looooove my iPhone. (For the time being, I'm biphonal, but the iPhone just does so much more than my Blackberry and does it so elegantly and engagingly that the Blackberry is probably headed for the recycling bin once its contract expires.)

And I'm sure the iPad will be a good product too. I never quite understood the appeal of the Kindle: there were relatively few things that it could do that my smartphone and/or laptop couldn't, but a lot of things that my smartphone and/or laptop could do that the Kindle couldn't. I don't own a Kindle so I have no right to bash it -- but there's nothing compelling about it. The appeal of the iPad, on the other hand, is a little bit more self-evident.

Still, as good as Apple's products are, they tend to get a little bit of a bonus from consumers. Average products are thought of as good; good products are thought of as great; great products are thought of as revolutionary. That's what a good brand does for you."

(http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/what-obama-shouldnt-learn-from-steve.html).  The italics are my own.


I don't personally own an iphone nor have I worked on an apple computer since middle school (and I'm almost 30) so I may be out of place here but it always seems to me that apple products are purchased as much for the image as the functionality.  This isn't to say that the products are junk or that they aren't functional.  I think they're ok or even good for the most part (the latest ipod mini with the controls integrated into the earphones being the exception) but the exorbitant price that they command simply cannot be justified by their functionality alone. 

Now as for the ipad, I think its a so-so product, about like the kindle.  Here I disagree with Nate's assessment, all the criticisms that could be levied against the kindle could also be directed at the ipad.  Both are niche products which don't really do much more than an entry level laptop and in some ways do less.  Some people will find a use for them that laptops can't do or do poorly but for most it'll be just another gadget.. a really really expensive gadget.  The kindle at least already has a niche carved out for it - ebook reading with the paper like screen - the niche for the ipad, to me at least, is not as clear.  However, being seen with it says "I'm hip" or "I'm nerdy but cool nerdy - notice also my emo glasses" (no offense to any of you sporting the emo look).  I think Apple consumers like to look like non-conformists but ironically end up with some of the most proprietary technology out there.
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
This topic has the following siblings:

The iPad fiasco - IPad reviews

Discussion info
Latest Post: April 2, 2010 at 4:23 PM
Number of posts: 9
Spans 56 days
Related conversations

  
Searching
No results found.