The mills of justice, and The Truth:

In his short story “The Truth” Pirandello writes about justice in the eye of the peasant Tararà, who compares it to the imposing new mill just built in his village, with its new and complicated machinery. He mistrusts the new mill. Everyone was bringing their grain there and no one could assure him that the flour he got was from his own.

In the story we got one true fact : Tararà murdered his wife. The question being who is responsible, and that’s where The Truth becomes subjective. Depending on the way Tararà’s version is presented, the punishment will vary, and I didn’t quite get at the end if the punishment was too hard or too easy on him in the eye of the writer who writes:
“Thanks to this truth, so candidly confessed, Tararà was condemned to thirteen years of prison.”
(originially: “E in grazia della verità, così candidamente confessionata, Tararà fu condannato a tredici anni di reclusione.”)

You say your version of the truth, but when it gets mixed with other truths, what comes out at the end? What flour will come out of the mills of justice?