Occupy the Internet
AAAhhhh... I'm going out of my mind AAAhhhh... I'm going out of my mind The Truth - you can't handle the Truth! Broken judges and moral system
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
The Truth - you can't handle the Truth! Broken judges and moral system
People have lost the grip of The Truth. They don't know what it is anymore, and in their futile attempt to hold on to it they have become enslaved to it as the ultimate goal. Our moral and judgment system want to transform us into truth saying robots with no emotions or thoughts. Their perfect citizen is a robot caring only about themselves and telling the truth. Let me give you an example.

In Israel a highly respected, decorated, general in the army has been demoted and effectively thrown out of the army for lying. What happened was that he let his 14 year old son drive a military tractor or some other vehicle, and his son hit a car. He immediately payed the guy for the damages, but because it was a military vehicle he reported the case to the military, though changing the person driving to his driver rather than his son.
The judges decided that telling the truth is what the army is based on and is (one of) the most important of the military creeds and he should serve as example and be effectively thrown out of the army for it.

Let us for a moment retreat from the hilarity of saying that telling the truth is one of the most important of the military creeds, there are several things here that I find mind boggling.
First is the complete and utter lack of appreciation. This guy put his life on the line constantly for his fellow soldiers and for the citizens of Israel, and now, well he lied - off with his head. If this was an isolated obscure legal case it would be one thing, but that is how people in the world are and it's tough to watch. There is no appreciation for the past or other deeds that people do. You gave your life to the country, great, but then you stole a dollar - throw him out. Again, this is in all areas of life.
(Though incidentally, when it comes to rape cases and sexual abuse, there the judges seem to remember how helping his family is important, and how already the person's name got stained, so he shouldn't really receive anything more than 20 hours community service. Or, if they really decide to throw the book at the guy, it's a week in jail and pay the girl a $1000. This in what seems like almost all sexual abuse cases).

Second, since when is telling the truth become the foremost moral judgment? People used to laugh at Kant that he supposedly said that if someone comes to kill your brother and asks you if he's home you have to say yes because you shouldn't lie. (Kant was misunderstood, but that's besides the point.) Apparently this is how we measure character nowadays. We are not supposed to have emotions, we are not supposed to protect our loved ones, only to tell the truth. Would you want such a person as a general of the army??? Would you want someone who will sacrifice the lives of people so he wouldn't lie, or would you prefer someone who would lie and cheat for a good cause?

So the guy made a mistake, big fucking deal. You give him a slap on the wrist and forget about it. It's not like his actions harmed anybody. But they do harm people's sense of truth.
And then you read the newspaper journals explaining how he got exactly what he deserves and even he specifically is a good man it is important to set an example, and that what is more important - sense of duty to your fellow man or telling the truth. Seriously people, people actually write that while saying the most important thing (for a military guy!!!) is to tell the truth. Un-Believable.

(To make myself clear, I should add that I'm not advocating constantly lying, or even not always telling the truth. Personally I even find telling the truth a much simpler way of life, though it does have its costs with it. But even if I personally choose that route I wouldn't be quick to judge people who lie.)

In what kind of society do people want to live in, that is the question? Is the truth such an important value?


I think it comes from fear. Fear from losing the grip. Losing the grip of The Truth. We don't know what it is anymore and we will do anything to try to recapture it.
Hi Roy,
I'll add an example from the US. Another army example (I'll note that your quote: you can't handle the truth is also from a movie scene in an army court).
In the US the fact that army can't handle the truth is almost legalized in the "don't ask don't tell" policy. That is, if a gay person wants to join the army he can't say he's gay as the army doesn't accept gays, but the army decided not to ask and as long as you don't volunteer the information then they won't do anything about it. Still quite pathetic, but they can't handle the basic truth of gay people. They simply can't handle it.

Another example from here which comes to mind is Clinton. A president lying to his country when saying "I did not have an affair with that woman." But though people know their elected officials constantly have affairs it can't be brought to light as people can't handle it.  Here again you have the crucial place of people demanding the truth, but then they can't handle knowing it. They couldn't handle knowing it in the 60s either but at least then they didn't demand it.

Speaking about morals in general I see you raised a similar case with the funny discussion on monogamy.
In a concomitant discussion on How to read history? Who writes it? on lacking a sense of truth in history,  Imogen yesterday said in post:
"...it's very strange that after the shock and horror of the twentieth century, we could have come to a place where history doesn't exactly seem to most people to matter. I wonder why this is? Is its weight simply too much to bear? It would be interesting to try to understand why. Maybe too many movies? Perhaps we don't feel exactly that anything is real."

Montaigne, strongly relates memory to lying:
"It is not unreasonably said that anyone who does not feel sufficiently strong in memory should not meddle with Lying."
It is a surprising connection.

This connection of his relates these two discussions. There is really a sense now of a break from the past and from history. Perhaps this same sense of uneasiness towards history and what "really" happened, is what is accompanying our sense of questioning what is real.

You mention Roy "losing the grip of The Truth." Montaigne continues, in a part that I find absolutely fascinating: "In what liars invent completely, inasmuch as there is no contrary impression which clashes with the falsehood, they seem to have the less reason to fear making a mistake. Nevertheless even this, since it is an empty thing without a grip, is prone to escape any but a very strong memory."

Has not having a past weakened our grip of the truth, from which this craze for the truth which you mention. Can there even be truth, reality, without memory?

How should we understand then the place of art and the way it lies (see for example Inglourious Basterds)?  Especially as Montaigne also says: "In truth lying is an accursed vice."
The craze of truth can also be seen in a certain rejection of fiction and desire for "reality" TV (even if this reality is more fictitious and made up than the tv series of the past).
Books Discussed
The Complete Works (Everyman's Library)
by Michel de Montaigne
The Writing of History
by Michel de Certeau

I’d like to add a musical angle to this interesting discussion. The evolution of interpretation has gone from old time’s priority - giving meaning to the texts, to today’s priority - respecting every sign in the URTEXT editions. There is an obsession with playing from the most precise and true to the source editions (which I share, ideally we should all have at all time access to the manuscripts), as well as playing on the instruments of each period. This search of the truth in the interpretation is certainly positive, but one cannot help thinking that while we are so obsessed with playing each note correctly and respecting every indication of the score, the musicians of the golden age came (in my opinion) closer to the pieces’ truth, and this not necessarily through the aim of respect as through the work on the justesse.

Juste in French is a wonderful expression that has different interpretations: it is just (as it is right), or it is in tune (justesse). C’est juste, means it’s undeniably true, and I believe this should be always our goal, and the Urtexts editions and manuscripts only our means.
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Discussion info
Latest Post: February 12, 2011 at 11:22 AM
Number of posts: 19
Spans 611 days

  
Searching
No results found.