Occupy the Internet
Gym Sports NBA Thoughts on NBA playoffs 2010
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
Thoughts on NBA playoffs 2010
I thought I'd start a a place for general thoughts on 2010 NBA playoffs. Any kind of thoughts about it.
I'll start off with a few.

1. In post, I already mentioned: Doc Rivers, the Celtics'  coach, was interviewed after his team beat LeBron James' Cleveland. LeBron was heavily criticized for his performance of the previous game/s. The first thing Doc said was how it was an incredibly hard work to guard LeBron. That was a class act. In a very subtle way he thus mentions how good is LeBron, and how it was the defense that made the difference and not LeBron's poor play. No wonder players like him.

2. I also mentioned in post that the reason Cleveland lost was not because LeBron didn't have a supporting cast but because the Celtics played magnificent defense:
"(For the record, great defense makes everyone in the opposing team look bad, as bad defense makes everyone looks great. The Celtics played simply magnificent defense. It is not by accident that all of a sudden everyone the Celtics play against has played inexplicably bad. Everyone complains about all the players in Miami besides Wade, and everyone in Cleveland besides LeBron like they just didn’t appear. What an amazing coincidence.)"

We can assume several more players aren't going to show up for Orlando this coming series.

3. Miami's coach, Erik Spoelstra, is a really good coach. He didn't have a lot of talent to work with, but he made the team much better than the sum of the parts.

4. On people getting off the LeBron train. One bad game and all of a sudden people start questioning LeBron. Besides the stupidity of it, I'll add that we knew LeBron had issues, and though when they win he got the credit, usually his supporting cast gets the blame when they lose. The team clearly doesn't have character, as was visible in last year's playoffs. But what people forget is how long it took Kobe to become a winner. Kobe had Shaq, but his character was not of a winner. He liked to take the winning shot, and many times make it, but he didn't have that instinct to bury teams. Without Shaq he wouldn't have won any championships until last year. It took him years (of losing) to change. LeBron will become a winner and will win championships. He'll change. He's still young and people change. Perhaps he'll team up with someone who can help him.

Compare him and KG. KG so much wants to win it is inspiring to see. One often feels LeBron wanting to show off more than win, and again, Kobe was similar.

5. What people don't mention when talking about LeBron poor game 5 performance is the Rondo effect. Rondo's amazing game 4 where he had a monster tripe-double screwed up LeBron's head. He was supposed to be having these numbers and all of a sudden a complimentary player in the opposing team is having them! I think he just didn't know how to respond to that. He was focusing on stopping Rondo more than about succeeding himself.

6. Derrick Rose. At some point in game 3 of the first round series between Chicago and Cleveland LeBron moved to guard Rose. Rose perked up and all of a sudden had double the speed and focus. It was impressive to watch. The effect of competition on people is one of most interesting and fun things when watching sports. He'll become an impressive player.

That's it for now. Awaiting to hear your thoughts.
Hi Arthur,
People complain why Boston, Rasheed Wallace in particular, coasted through the regular season, but until someone appreciates wins in the regular season older teams should coast. The more you win in the regular season the more people will be upset when you lose in the playoffs, and you won't get any credit for it. As long as you don't mind playing away from home, better get some rest and arrive healthy.

Either give credit for winning in the regular season, or if you say the only thing that matter is the playoffs, expect less effort during the year. You can't have it both ways.
I agree George.
A quick note on the conference finals game 1, Bos-Orl. At some point Nelson had consecutive 3 pointers, similarly to how LeBron had in the previous game. In both cases Doc immediately calls time-out and shuts it down, and the Celtics go on a run.
That is to say that it's not so much the fault of the offense as the really magnificent defense of the Celtics (for most of the game). This was both the case with Cleveland and now with Orlando.
There is a lot to be said for a team full of healthy older players. Last year Boston didn't have Kevin Garnett for the play offs. Big difference. The maturity of a team like Boston shows at this time of year. It's not about one individual carrying a team, although an individual, like Rondo, may have an outstanding game. Those guys just know what it takes to win a championship. Offense may win games but defense wins championships.

Also, never count out a team with a great point guard. That is the one position that has the capacity to make all team mates better. Rondo has grown tremendously in the last three years.
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Discussion info
Latest Post: May 27, 2010 at 3:35 AM
Number of posts: 9
Spans 12 days

  
Searching
No results found.