Andy, I share your ideas for the most part, differing mainly that mine don’t have the opposition between black white playing out between whole persons, but structurally, in the nature of thinking itself.
As I have come to see it the Eden story is about how, and from what, thinking, cognition was (is) born, and the effects of this newly born ability.
I don’t have my bible anymore, but unable to give chapter and verse, still, the Book of Genesis describes how God created the world twice, two times. Convention has it that this duplication of chapters was a literary device. The duplication serving to hammer home a point. But let’s think otherwise for a minute, reading it chronologically, that a world was in fact created before the one we know, and proved inadequate (all metaphorically, of course).
God created the first world, but it lay “fallow, seeds in the ground without growing.” (The citation is an approximation from memory.) The world proved inadequate in God’s eyes, so he tried again. The second world proceeded along identically to the first, but with an important exception. He introduced names, nouns, and a means of differentiating one thing from another.
In the first world there was no Adam, no Eve, only Man and Woman. Without differentiation there could be no history, no means of priority, no way of one thing gaining victory over another. Everything was in potential only.
There is a single verse dividing the two worlds. Again, you’ll have to look it up because I can’t remember the exact wording or verse number.
A ghost remains: the previous whole world. A world perfect though static. A world where no one worries about having to prevail over another, and we yearn. And doubt returns us to that perfection, though not spatialized, nor temporalized, laid not in front of us nor behind, but within.