I love the Don Draper character.
This is a deeply conflicted character with a confused childhood who like many, entered the army to escape, only to find himself in the hell-hole of the Korean War. And then as a gift from heaven, he finds a way to lose himself and start life anew.
Only one problem, no matter where you go - there you are.
Draper represents a whole generation of the 50s and 60s who find themselves in an unfamiliar world of affluence not knowing how to be comfortable with it. He knows his life is a deception and doesn't believe he deserves to be there. He has a hugh amount of moral ambiguity. Just the profession of advertising is about appearance over substance. He's perfect for it. His relationships with women echo something in his childhood and are pretty much about reassurance rather than sexual gratification.
Betty is also a caricature of a certain type of "spoiled" little girl grown up to be pampered wife, only to find the role empty. She's moving on to find meaning - in another man who will take care of her and give her the attentions she craves, rather than finding it within herself. She is the anti-feminist.
It's been pretty interesting to watch Draper's character develop. I'm rooting for him to come to some sort of epiphany, but in reality that rarely happened for the real Madison Ave. types. They worked, made lots of money, drank, smoked, bought things, got old and died in Conneticut. Not nearly as interesting as Don's story.
"Draper represents a whole generation of the 50s and 60s who find
themselves in an unfamiliar world of affluence not knowing how to be
comfortable with it. He knows his life is a deception and doesn't believe
he deserves to be there."
“Betty is also a caricature of a certain type of
"spoiled" little girl grown up to be pampered wife,”
I know when talking about television shows its not common to
ask for sources, but, I was curious as to whether your examination had some
basis in something I might read up on. Are their books or sources you might
refer me to that might lend themselves to the conclusions you reached about the
characters in “Mad Men”? I know it might be a reach, but is their anything you might recommend?