Funny
story Dana, but isn't it more like : “In potential do we trust” ?
It amounts to the same thing, but I can better understand the trust
felt towards potential than the blindness.
I
think that it is often not so much blindness as a calculated move-a
trust that comes from the fact that whomever, or whatever it is, is
yet in its infancy, and therefore is more open to being manipulated
by the trustees. As if the will of the potential is not yet developed
enough to be an obstacle and therefore the trusted object can be
“used” more easily to the trustee's own benefits and private
goals.
Another
thing is that the moment people support someone, or something- they
put themselves in the front. It is their intellect, their
capacity to think and judge, their ideas and ideologies that
will be closely looked at and most probably criticized.
Failure
is better taken when something is young. First, because we all know
that babies don't always turn to be as great as when they were
little, and it's therefore not such a bad judgment on the judges'
behalf, it is rather an unfortunate but understandable
disappointment. Secondly, as we all think “young is cute” , the
general judgment is more lenient towards everyone concerned,
including the trustees. And last point- it is not given to all the
ability to see, understand or recognize novelty and genius. It is
most unfortunately an ability given to the very few, that are
becoming even fewer (and are soon going to be an extinct race).
Greetings Edna,
You wrote ' it is not given to all the ability to see, understand or recognize novelty and genius. It is most unfortunately an ability given to the very few, that are becoming even fewer (and are soon going to be an extinct race).'
How do you arrive at that conclusion, and if correctly so, isn't that very frightening?