Occupy the Internet
The Living Room Philosophy Writing Vs. Abstract thought
THINQon is a platform for a more intelligent web. It aims to replace the ruling paradigm of the web – that of sharing and gathering information – with a sharing and achieving of understanding. Instead of the Q&A model it offers an experience. A platform for discovery of ideas, people, and yourself.     Continue >
Writing Vs. Abstract thought
Our times are very strange-with all the information that is stored virtually everywhere. I was struck by the huge gap between this current situation and a description I'm just reading at the moment in Arendt's “Life of the mind,” where she describes Plato's objections to the written word, though I will just add that this passage refers specifically to writing philosophy :

For there is no way of putting these things in words like other things that one can learn. Hence, no one who possesses the true faculty of thinking (nous), and therefore knows the weakness of words, will ever risk framing thoughts in discourse, let alone fix them in so inflexible a from as that of written letters...”

...“There is first the fact that writing “will implant forgetfulness”; relying on the written word, men “cease to exercise memory.” There is second the written word's “majestic silence”; it can neither give account of itself nor answer questions. Third, it cannot choose whom to address, falls into wrong hands, and “drifts all over the place”; ill treated and abused, it is unable to defend itself ; the best one can say for it is to call it a harmless “pastime,” collecting “a store of refreshment... against the day 'when oblivious age come' or a “recreation [indulged in] as others regale themselves with drinking parties and the like.”

Of course, Plato was the one writing down Socrates thoughts, and Arendt is writing down her thoughts, which is what I'm reading- but both are thinking of the relation of thought and writing.

It is similar in music, listening to music in one's head is very different from playing it. For example, when I listen to Chopin's Nocturne op. 37 no. 1, I hear the middle part as a choral sang by a choir of men. I don't quite get that effect with the piano, it is difficult to catch that specific color that one finds in one's head.

It is extreme and might not be directly connected to the current subject, but I find it nevertheless interesting to bring here and reflect on. How would we live in a world where things are ephemeral? Where everything is stored in the mind?

I believe one should carefully move and explore the possibilities between those two extremes and see the advantages each brings into one's life, and make accordingly a conscious decision on how to moderate or indulge in one's reliance on writing and other moderns ways through which technology extends our writing possibilities (photographs, videos, etc.)
Books Discussed
The Life of the Mind (Combined 2 Volumes in 1) (Vols 1&2)
by Hannah Arendt

One of the gains of writing (see also the topic on why do we write) is a decision on the appearance of our thoughts, their dress and haircut.

A related story.
Every time I go to the hairdresser I am forced to look at my reflection for a long time. Every time, I think that this time I will prepare and won't have to behold a tired and drawn face, but a smiley and glamorous one. I think this time I will dress nicely and put on make-up so that the act itself of looking at my reflection won't make me feel even more tired and drawn. It never works, I'm always late and running to my appointment and don't get the time to prepare. While sitting there last time, I thought about the ideal way I would like to appear, and understood that this is actually a question of imagination, focus and performance. I should imagine myself in a situation, see and focus on how I would like to appear and subsequently perform myself to the best of my capabilities. It is a mistake to want to appear with no preconception of what I want my appearance to be like.
It is extreme and might not be directly connected to the current subject, but I find it nevertheless interesting to bring here and reflect on. How would we live in a world where things are ephemeral? Where everything is stored in the mind?  I believe one should carefully move and explore the possibilities between those two extremes and see the advantages each brings into one's life, and make accordingly a conscious decision on how to moderate or indulge in one's reliance on writing  ~ES

Absolutely.  Writing should be a sacrament I suppose.  It's a tremendous responsibility to transcribe thoughts into written words that can be passed about indiscriminately.
It's a tremendous responsibility to read, as well.   
Writers and readers have to start out knowing that they may get it wrong.  In transmitting and receiving something always gets lost in translation.
Writing and reading are not just utilitarian skills.  Are they always an art form?  They probably should be.



 
How would we live in a world where everything is stored in the mind? That is just a preliterate society such as north america in 1491. Whilst humans were capable of feats of memory that we find incredible there are real limitations. When an old person dies, a library is destroyed.
Join the Community
Full Name:
Your Email:
New Password:
I Am:
By registering at THINQon.com, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Discussion info
Latest Post: July 20, 2011 at 3:23 PM
Number of posts: 20
Spans 111 days

  
Searching
No results found.